Different domains. As long as the control of the domain is not interfered with, both can win at their own games.
As an ENTP, I tend to take into consideration external patterns, and the feelings people have about embracing these external patterns. Then I think about them and form connections between different conceptual structures, or what we might call “paradigms”. This really isn't a form of magic, although it might be taken to be as much by those who can't see how I got there. What I'm really doing is making a mental map of outlying terrain. This helps me to understand systems, how they function, and where their functional flaws are. But more than that, over an extensive period of time and experience, I can also make effective cognitive leaps, for instance to see that the Myer-Briggs function Fi is most likely undergirding belief systems in Ontology, and that such consequent implicit beliefs in “the soul”, “self”, or an identity that remains unchanging, are inevitably linked to a moralizing tendency, which is in turn linked to the notion of teleology. (That “we are here on this Earth to undergo systems of improvement.”) And I can link ALL of this to Nietzsche’s critique of “slave morality”. In short “ontology=slave morality”.
The problem is to explain the long and tireless process by which I came to this conclusion or realisation. It's not that I don't know — I can state what I've encountered over time — but every time I point to the exterior world and say, “Look there, there are actually patterns we can register!” I hit a blank. This is even with INTJs, who lack Ne (extraverted intuition ) and so fail to see “the patterns”.
And so that's the problem, right there! I can win on my own terms, every time, if I just go along with my own mental map, on which I see “patterns”, but if I try to explain it, I meet with hostility. Apparently to register reality in this way is “grandiose”, no matter how painstaking ones methods may be or how much they include checking and rechecking.
So we can see how the INTJs can win by stealth, simply by relabelling something that is very good ( extraverted intuition, in fact) as something more mysterious and harmful, in fact something very bad indeed. Certainly they do not directly observe the external ”patterns” in the world, that make up our environment. They're more inclined to just pick up a sense of things and run with it. If they are wrong, then they are overcommitted to being very wrong. Of course they could knit together a plausible sounding explanation, and because they are much more systematic than an ENTP ( due to extraverted thinking), they would be more likely to believed.
Somehow, however, I don't like reverse alchemy: this changing back from gold into its former base metal. But alas it is one of the INTJs covert powers to beat the ENTP.
Add a comment