-
I think one of the most terrifying things is to have other people demand things of you, or even get punitive, when you are in a mode of incompleteness.When I first migrated to Australia, I was in a mode of real incompleteness and psychological shock. As we know, that continued for some time.But I also had a lot of hidden pressures. My first pressure was simply to adapt to my new external circumstances. But, as well as this, I had parents who began to lean on me as the eldest – not just a bit, but quite heavily. I had to be the bridge for their adjustments. But at the same time they insisted we are proud people who will not adjust our values or behavior or language to conform to the new norms.Add onto this my father’s raw mental state and barely contained vengefulness, as he became angry at having to readjust midlife. He had fully believed the ideology of the Rhodesian rulers about maintaining a standard for Western civilization based on Christianity – one that would have been superlatively good, in a society that was assured survival BECAUSE of its reliance on God despite monumental political and psychological pressures. So when that was shown, by circumstances, to be false, he was profoundly rocked to the core of his being as well as subconsciously – but never openly – outraged at the betrayal, which had taken on metaphysical proportions by now.So I had to cope with his extreme levels of aggression at me, and displacement of the blame for Rhodesia’s demise, onto me. Nothing I did was ever perfect or good enough. And because I had to constantly use a lot of energy to defend myself from his ventures into my personal space (both literally and figuratively), I had difficulty recovering my own equilibrium and felt rather raw myself.Along with this, others also never really let me adjust. They kept telling me things I could not make sense of, implying that my life has been easy or “privileged” and that now I would have to pay.But my life in the past and even in the present was rather precarious. In the present it was more so, since I had become emotionally blocked from experiencing my own sensations, since people kept implying that I ought to feel guilty about who I was.So I became this de-sensationalized person. And then people put on more pressure: “You need to adjust. You need to adjust!” – but I had lost my sensations.This is, I think, “soul loss”: one loses one’s capacities to function and one’s emotions make one frightened. One feels that there is something socially unacceptable about having emotions of any sort at all – and one tries to constrain them.But these blocked off aspects then become unknown aspects of the self and represent a puzzle and a source of danger. One has to try to draw them out slowly, but that has NOW become a psychologically transgressive motion and fraught with danger. One is drawing out emotions that others have described a socially unacceptable.This process is terrifying, too.And then there are the secondary effects of all of this – people noticing your incompleteness and commenting on it. That adds another layer of psychological difficulty and mental confusion.So, to function when you are incomplete is very difficult.I actually think it is almost unbelievable that I made it out the other side, into completeness, finally. Given my circumstances, you would not think I would. But here I am!0
Add a comment
-
As for dignity, I do think it is the freedom to carry oneself upright, to the full length of one’s being. To have to bow down, to be hunched over, to have people address themselves as if to someone half your height, or to your body rather than your mind, is undignified.Also—I think it is a very fruitful area to look into WHAT IT TAKES to see oneself from the outside and WHY this is important. I think it is important because one needs to know what one’s actual range is, and where others may mislead you about your range or make you take on a false sense of identity to serve their purposes.It seems to me that in the second leg of my shamanic journey (after the frightening initiatory experience), I tried to learn what others thought of me, but more importantly how valid or invalid those assessments really were. It might seem self-obsessed to embark on a journey to find out what others think of you, and indeed it is, but I could not gain a deeper sense of reality unless I knew what was true and what was false about their perceptions. (I could have taken on the identity that had been bestowed on me, but that felt like misshapen clothes and shoes that didn’t even fit.)So, one must do something very dangerous which is to solicit for other people’s opinions, in an often hostile context, when one doesn’t want to “wear” their opinions at all, but find out what they are in order to know what is true or false about society’s appraisals of oneself. Once one has enough information from the outside, one can close the circle and not take in any more data. But until then, one has to be open and try to process the data that may not make much direct sense.
And all of this is just to reclaim one’s dignity by being aware of false projections (false attire) and being able to dress only as one chooses.0Add a comment
-
There is a similarity between “calls” and “callings”, because not everybody can speak to everyone. So it is important to know who you can speak to and who you cannot. If you do not have a deep urge inside of you to communicate with certain types of people, I think that it is worse than counterproductive to try to do so.That is why it is very important to learn who one is. Now I tried to make a video yesterday, but it was very noisy (Mike was playing music very loudly) and I was trying to think and couldn’t capture my ideas effectively enough, except as a draft. Also I was extremely tired yesterday (and still a bit today). But what I wanted to say (and what I will do better, once I get the energy) is that I am now much more aware that the kind of person I am is not very interesting in infecting people who are motived primarily by excitement with greater enthusiasm. I’m very negative in that department. I understand the principles – but I am a worse than bad communicator if I try to come across as all energetic and enthused about some new fad. That is because my basic character is oriented toward duty, (which can be enjoyable too – and kind of Apollonian in your sense). But I’m not this frenzied kind of energetic communicator. So I don’t have CALLING to communicate with such people who expect that and I actually (more tellingly) cannot make the CALLS they recognize or come to expect. If I try, I make a false noise – and then people say I am trying to endear myself by being false. Which isn’t at all true. I was complying with external expectations in the line of duty, and just lacked motivation and capacity.So I’m better if I rest on my own weight, even if that is sometimes lacking in some ways. My own weight is to be circumspect about the calls of duty. I CAN be expansive within the range that this principle allows. But I am not – you know – like the aerobics instructor, or the faddish person that writes a bestseller like “Eat, Pray, Love”. I don’t have that in me. Like you, I am more of a theoretician than an actor or performer. I’m also, in a deep way, a scientist, because I like to observe reactions and then tweak them, often from a relatively safe distance.
So, anyway, the video was supposed to be about my calling, and I will have to make it again, when I am not so tired.0Add a comment
Add a comment