Even in the original poem it is a bit cryptic. It relates to the video, though, about three-quarters through, where the narcissists use normality to make their perversities believable. The more complete context of the poem is that whitewash was used a lot in the colony Marechera was born into. As a metaphor he throught everything was made to look more moral and pure than it was. Reality only becomes "believable" once it is made false -- that is, covered over in whitewash. (There is also some secondary implied commentary here about race and colonial culture.) The comment talks about power relations and covering up the truth, because most people will not believe direct psychological reality OR sordid political reality if it is explained to them. They just don't think such explanations are "realistic".
Here is more of the politically critical cryptic poem:
He lost his arms, his legs, his trunk
All that remained was from the neck upwards
Grinning sheepishly, apologetically
He was a poem pared down to its essentials
Grinning sheepishly, apologetically, honest!
His father died in primary school
His father rose again to run the factory
Turning on his bicycle the axis of the moon
Turning in his sleep, this endless sweep of stars
Aphrodite sealed between two sides of the coin
Is it your shrieks I hear when my gold jingles?
Sword-bearing arm cleaves day’s placid leg
I cannot bear all thought to food
In the bucket is whitewash enough
To make our world realistic
“But you can’t love your sister that way!”
In every dustbin, in every rubbish heap
A teacher pleading innocence
Pleading ignorance.
-
I faced discrimination in part because of society's identity politics, which gives people a false epistemology and false justification for redressing historical wrongs by putting down certain people who are seen to be deserving of it. A social revolution in underway that favors the infantile states and acts as if any kind of adulthood or "mastery" (which is really what adulthood is), is an offence and moral danger to the status quo. I really hold this hypothesis quite strongly. I imagine that as someone who is Hispanic, you would be deemed to have strong masculine (that is symbolically "masculine") traits. But part of the movement we are experiencing is toward the infantile and sterotypically feminine dimension of things. Mastery is out of style. That could be understandable enough, but more than this, mastery is seen as a moral danger to the "children" of society -- the innocent, unwashed, chaotic masses, and their unhindered feeling states. Of course this also serves capitalism, since we can see that the producer on the side of capitalism is also a kind of master, whereas the consumer is slave to his or her desires. If you get people thinking as consumers and not as masters, you can more effectively dominate them. They are much more malleable.0
Add a comment
-
Sometimes help-seeking is legimately requested and my own requests were never deemed legitimate. I really had come from an entirely different country and set of social circumstances, and if I made any request on the basis of that I was dismissed as if I had been involved in a puerile activity of attention-seeking. I was fifteen and I needed a hell of a lot of adult guidance to adjust from a society that was in some ways equivalent to Europe in the late eighteenth century or earlier. Instead, I kept getting, "But you already know this. Stop drawing attention to yourself."
Because of these put-downs, I eventually developed a tight band of tension along my throat so that I could not speak well, and I succumbed to chronic fatigue syndrome from the ongoing stress of trying to figure out everything on my own. It would be like if everyone else of your age had studied for an exam by taking similar classes for about fifteen years, but you hadn't, and you had to come in on the scene at a late stage and take the same exam under the same criteria as everybody else -- no leniency allowed for you! I think that perhaps due to the prevalance of narcissists in Western society, but ALSO due to the mindset of narcissism itself, which simply cannot take into account linear time (which means, cannot allow for the reality of history or indeed of other people having experienced radically different historical circumstances), people like me are summarily dismissed as whiners and 'bellyaching".0Add a comment
-
With regard to 28:18 or so, I think that they do try to draw you in to their centre of gravity (as a black hole) by means of requesting sympathy. Sometimes you might find their problems to have been real, but I think that doesn't mean we have to take responsibility for them ourselves. After all, we are relative strangers. The kind of responsibility we could take would be in such things as watching their back or setting up domestic violence shelters and that sort of thing. People who need these sorts of things ought not to be disregarded They should be able to ask for assistance in an adult way and they deserve to get adult sympathy and adult support. The problem is the model of nurturing (which has now been promoted by educators as the norm. Cf. "child centred education", where the teacher takes a back seat to the needs of the putative all-knowing child). Because of this culture of making everything child centred, grown adults my also feel no compunction in being demanded to be nurtured as if they were children, still learning about the world. They push the responsibility of being clear onto others, whilst being unclear about anything themselves.
For instance someone recently said they felt "uninspired" by an explanation in one of my videos. Here we have a grown adult who sits around and demands that others should inspire him. In fact he made no effort to explain what sorts of things in the world he might find inspiring. He just felt "uninspired". At the same time he used the narcissistic ploy of a sub-text that implied I must be technical wrong about the subject matter I was discussing, because he felt "uninspired". This is typical behavior of a narcissist, in that it is completely lazy intellectually and even attempts to link an emotional (infantile) sensation of satisfacton to the presence or absence of intellectual truth. That's the way an infant thinks at the level of bottle-feeding. "This product (milk) gives me a sense of emotional satisfaction, therefore it is reality itself and no more effort is needed on my part."
I made this video in response to him to educate other listeners:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UFiCl1gJMY0Add a comment
Add a comment