1. Do we have "a self"? Buddhism, psychoanalysis Vs. shamanism - YouTube



    I think some of the tenets of some of the Buddhisms (because of course, there are many more than one,) is that the "no-self" is the same as what you are referring to as the overseer or monitor of the system. I had done some reading at one point, specific to Tibetan Buddhism, and it was helpful at the time because it relieved me of the Christian burden of the "eternal soul", and replaced that with the kind of "self" you are referring to here, which seem to me just really more of the part of our consciousness through which we interact with various sensory and internal inputs. Which is to say, it's very useful, but not something one would really ultimately benefit from imagining into some endless future. It's a bit like saying a computer processor lives forever in heaven after the
    actual processor+computer have completely mechanically failed. How bizarre.

    From my own view at this particular stage of my life (age 52,) I observe that leaves
    grow and fall. The ocean waves come in and go out. Every hour, across the world,
    some six thousand people die. In that same hour, 15,000 are born. Each minute,
    some 105 peope die, and 250 are born. Each second, worldwide, two people die,
    and four people are born. To me, this is a kind of breathing, and this is what
    that "Buddhist" kind of mindfulness taught me. is that humans come in the world
    and go out of the world like leaves and like waves. A wave of humans goes out, a
    wave of humans comes in. Foxes, sea stars, clouds, nations... it is all a great and
    wondrous flux. I just see myself as one of those leaves, one of those flowers, one of
    those waves of humans that came in on that day, back in 1964. I'll do my best in this
    place with this mind, and someday, I will fall from the tree, crash on the shore,
    and take a breath in or out, which is followed by no more breaths in or out.
    Any meanings beyond that, seem entirely subjective, and as transitory as
    everything else. As you so beautifully put, one eventually just gets on with
    it. One eventually susses out the situation of one's birth, and either chooses to
    jump off the mountain, or start learning the ropes.

    I have no idea whether looking at a 'self" in this way is considered healthy or
    unhealthy, but it has been a refuge from the narcissistic, rigid, and self-obssessed
    society I was born into, and was forged from a deep conviction that the f***ing
    emperor was as naked as the day he was born. I have felt surrounded by endless
    discussion about the finery of the emperor's clothing. Tomes to fill whole cities
    have discussed the pattern and the fabric. I trusted my eyes, more than their
    words. The more I trusted my own instincts, the more my diagnosis was "blindness".
    In a society which functions on manipulation, coercion, and deception, those who
    strive for authenticity and autonomy are considered enemies of the state.

    Thank you for your illuminating and thoughtful reply.

    As a complete and totally unrelated aside, the book which Black Sunlight put
    me in mind of, is Guyotat's "Eden, Eden, Eden". It's an insult to Marechera
    to say so perhaps, but the initial sense of having walked straight-on into
    a jet engine was similar.
     
    Yes! That book you mentioned in the last paragraph may have strong similarities to Marechera's writing. Thank you for mentioning it.
    As for the Buddhist world view, I think I understand what you are saying. At the same time, there remains a question about subjectivity and what one should do with it. To say that a viewpoint is "just subjective" is to betray it, because there is no viewpoint possible apart from subjectivity. Subjectivity is the only means by which one has a viewpoint. On the other hand, moving toward a disregard for too much subjectivity, indeed a philosophical attitude to it, might seem normal and appropriate as one gets older, because one incorporates, then, a certain knowledge about death and a certain capacity for letting go of things, in some respects. This is the tempering process of wisdom and it is what makes us beautiful as we get older.
    0

    Add a comment

  2. 1

    View comments

  3. Political victimization examples & a gamble in 'shamanizing' - YouTube



    hhmm I may need week to consider that one haha
    I don't have a pciture developed for post modernism, in order to see this extreme subjectivity.
    Maybe if I break out my Nietzsche reader I wold find the answer :D
    Show less
     
    +Falls 2Shine Postmodernists believe they are continuing Nietzsche's legacy, but this is really not the case, in my view. What they perpetuate is the normalizing of narcissism, even the universalization of it, but then they introduce a strong element of self-doubt, so that you are supposed to self-efface to undo the narcissism that they have normalized. That is why postmodernist Westerners are always down on "the West" (but not in the manner of making a critique of it). They are trying to oppose their own narcissism, by applying a level of masochism to it. It really leaves them locked in their own minds with no world view and nothing against which to compare their own mental states.
    0

    Add a comment

  4. Political victimization examples & a gamble in 'shamanizing' - YouTube



    Hmm I wonder then can we (or do you) generally think/say that the left wing politics is likely to lean towards covert narcissism and the right towards overt?
    The covert narc is for sure more masochistic than sadistic and vice versa.
    Not sure that lines up well with your last example regarding Muslims though.
     
    Yeah, I would say so, regarding your first sentence. Unfortunately the whole of the West has been immersed in nothing but narcissistic sensations and logic, perpetuated by the normalization of an extreme subjectivity (not an adventurous or reality testing one, though) which is perpetuated through the teachings of postmodernism in the university systems, as much as by the commodification of all of reality.
    0

    Add a comment

  5. Vlog 323 Healing - YouTube



    I've noticed the sadism with many men who will subtly sabotage the achievements of independent women. It's very subtle indeed, but they do it by depriving you of the necessary information to do your job, whilst at the same time pretending to support you to the fullest extent possible.
    0

    Add a comment

  6. Political victimization examples & a gamble in 'shamanizing' - YouTube



     
    What scares me is that most are not exactly pretending, they seem to have deceived themselves willingly.
    If you see the University of Toronto situation with Jordan Peterson, you can see them getting extremely emotional like someone had spit on them.
    What I'm curious about is how this came about.
    Somewhere I heard mention that this generation has not had any troubles or crises and have looked to create one instead.
    This makes a lot of sense for me.
    I know people who have had everything handed to them by their parents, waited on hand and foot.
    The result was this crazy sense of entitlement and an extreme need to create drama out of nothing.
    Narcissistic behaviour, most likely due to not getting real love and attention, but having to either do something to earn it or create drama.

    The solution might be for this next generation of parents to break this cycle; or we may find this behaviour more and more present in the next few generations.
    Jennifer Armstrong 
    Someone once warned me: beware the masochist more than the sadist, because the masochist doesn't see anything wrong with causing you pain, as they already enjoy experiencing it themselves. I notice the whole logic of masochism in current identity politics. Which way will your internal logic of morality cause you to flip? That is the question. I see that those Muslims who want to reform Islam are now termed "anti-Islam extremists". At the same time, non-extremists are pressured to conform to many of the dictates of extreme Islam, "in solidarity" with its adherents. For instance, declining to wear the hijab for a contest in Iran is termed to be a betrayal of Iranian women. However, those who would like to see a more moderate Islam will say to you that the real, ethical choice would be for all women to boycott the event in solidarity with Iranian women. That second option is the non-masochistic response, though, so it will not be embraced by the SJWs.
    0

    Add a comment

  7. Vlog 322 Healing - YouTube



    Thing is, psychology rarely works because it deprives meaning of its context. One has to ask how can that ever work?? It is philosophically flawed and illogical. Place a matrix of wrong thinking with flawed premises over anyone's life and you will do more harm than good. Reality is made up of context, which just so happens to be political, economic, social, cultural and so on.
    0

    Add a comment

  8. Antistar21114

    Why were Nietzsche, Bataille, and Marachera shamanising for? What were they shamanising against? If they were indeed shamanising "against" something.



     Jennifer Armstrong

    Actually, they were all shamanizing against inauthenticity, which they experienced as a kind of gaslighting.

    Reply 2  

     Antistar211



    "Actually, they were all shamanizing against inauthenticity, which they experienced as a kind of gaslighting." Can you expand a bit on what you mean by that?



     Jennifer Armstrong

    Maybe in another video...but they were rebelling against the way that the prevailing ideology of their time mitigated against their own sense of a broader and more complex reality.  Nietzsche thought that religion contradicted his sense of meaning  & value, and above all, his intellectual struggle.  Bataille thought it was the bourgeois (middle class, capitalist) ideology, and Marechera felt it was colonialism.

    Reply 2


    0

    Add a comment

  9. Political victimization examples & a gamble in 'shamanizing' - YouTube

    0Antistar211 
    Antistar21110 minutes agoHIGHLIGHTED COMMENT
    Why were Nietzsche, Bataille, and Marachera shamanising for? What were they shamanising against? If they were indeed shamanising "against" something.
    Hide replies 
    Jennifer Armstrong 
    Actually, they were all shamanizing against authenticity, which they experienced as a kind of gaslighting.
    Antistar211 
    "Actually, they were all shamanizing against authenticity, which they experienced as a kind of gaslighting." Can you expand a bit on what you mean by that?
    Jennifer Armstrong 
    Maybe in another video...but they were rebelling against the way that the prevailing ideology of their time mitigated against their own sense of a broader and more complex reality. Nietzsche thought that religion contradicted his sense of meaning & value, and above all, his intellectual struggle. Bataille thought it was the bourgeois (middle class, capitalist) ideology, and Marechera felt it was colonialism.
    0

    Add a comment

  10. 0

    Add a comment

About Me
About Me
Labels
Loading
Dynamic Views theme. Powered by Blogger. Report Abuse.