1. Comments - YouTube



    Jennifer Armstrong
    i agree....lol....i still haven't decided if without hope we die....i keep gnawing at that one....i will say clarity goes a very long way.....as far as mental faculty and for some, spiritual growth are concerned.
     â–¼
    Maybe the thing is that once we get clarity, we need to also accumulate a totally different wherewithal to deal with it. Being in the religious viewpoint for too long makes the limbs and thinking soft. By contrast, the fact that we are going to die is hard enough to take, but one can make solid adjustments to it.
    0

    Add a comment

  2. Comments - YouTube



    Jennifer Armstrong
    I know Freud was very much influenced by the kabbalah and other jewish mystic texts.

    I gave come from a childhood of unquestioned deference to authority figures and now I find myself in analysis, I need to dive deep into myself to find out wet her my attraction to it is because of the authorative rarefied position the analyst assumes.
     â–¼
    I'm not quite sure I completely understand what you are saying. But it sounds like the therapist is assuming that social conditioning, which is something necessarily passive, is the opposite, which is to say an active element of attraction. Of course two can play at that game. The therapist is not devoid of emotion or of necessity, despite the opposite pose or posture. And we authoritarian types often have what those of contemporary liberal land do not have, which is an absolute store house of self-discipline. Rarely are our strengths understood or even anticipated
    0

    Add a comment

  3. 0

    Add a comment

  4. The journey of demystification - YouTube



    Just, so incredibly succintly and elegantly spoken. This is where the beauty
    of all your work really becomes apparent to the listener. You speak from
    experience and lots of work-- it's completely apparent. "Snake oil salesmen"
    cannot reproduce this level of authenticity, inauthentically. Thank you for
    all the work you've done on yourself, and thank you for sharing your
    thoughts and experiences with us.

    I know you make clear the distinction that you are not speaking of mysticism.
    And yet, the power of this level of clear thinking and observing has an oddly
    mystical feel to it. Perhaps because, once in the midst of this beautiful fray,
    when a clarity arrives it opens to whole new worlds of thought.
    Jennifer Armstrong 
    Thank you. And perhaps I make apparent what is also in the other works I have read.
    0

    Add a comment

  5. Comments - YouTube



    Excellent!!!!! You absolutely addressed the questions I was working
    to form, even tho' I did not ask them well. I'm realizing part of the challenge
    for me personally, is the issue of disparate or warring parts. There is the
    literal physical history of a "tri-racial" family, and all that meant as a person;
    ("Yes, those people are part of your family, but they do not talk to us because
    your great grandmother, their sister, married your great grandfather who was
    of mixed race, so now they won't have anything to do with us.") "Hide your
    accent or they'll think you're dumb". "Now hide your other accent, or
    they'll think you're uppity." "Pretend you're from somwhere else."
    Sit up straight. Not THAT straight, now you look haughty. Don't look
    them in the eye, they'll think you're aggressive. Look them in the
    eye, or they'll think you're lying about something. Exhausting!!!!!

    Having stumbled upon your ideas and Marechera's writing, has been
    a very exciting time for me. It is an opportunity to accept all the
    warring pieces for exactly what they are, and let them be a sort of
    wholeness all their own. So long, I tried to somehow homogenize
    myself. Now I realize, it's not necessary. To attempt it, wasn't helpful.
    However, intellectual shamanism is becoming for me, the natural
    outgrowth of all that reading I did away back when, of Foucault and
    Jeffery Jerome Cohen; because to me, their thinking was absolutely
    all about power and how it is used by people pretending they
    aren't using it. Those things, I could absolutely see. What I could
    not see, was how I could use these ideas personally and internally,
    to create my own inner wildness in which to be truly free.

    As always, thank you.
     â–¼
    What I am saying here does take its leaving point from a bases of thought From the post Nietzscheans (Foucault, etc), but it brings the project down to the level of the individual, and their striving, which makes of the information something more than just knowledge, but an actual, personal, adventure
    0

    Add a comment

  6. 0

    Add a comment

  7. 0

    Add a comment

  8. 0

    Add a comment

  9. Covert Aggression Destroys Society, Workplaces, Systems - Narcissism in Society - YouTube



    It really depends on whether people have access to the systems of nourishment that would enable either individuality or collectivism. A culture that promotes an ideology of individualism, but not the means, or the support or opportunities for people to be genuinely individualist, will cultivate much higher levels of distress than those quiet, collectivist societies that demand teamwork, but also give you the means to perform at a high level.
    0

    Add a comment

  10. 0

    Add a comment

Popular Posts
Popular Posts
  •  Different domains. As long as the control of the domain is not interfered with, both can win at their own games. As an ENTP, I tend to take...
  •  I love it. But Twain was in a sense too optimistic as travel is not always the answer. Or rather nothing beats being a local yokel and expe...
  •   What is a good book by Nietzsche to read in order to understand how he thought that people have an innate nature? Basically arguing nature...
About Me
About Me
Blog Archive
Blog Archive
Labels
Loading
Dynamic Views theme. Powered by Blogger. Report Abuse.