Comments on Jennifer Armstrong's answer to How can we critically reflect about postmodernism using postmodernism itself?
I posited something similar (albeit with a lot less eloquence and depth) in a discussion elsewhere and was told that I didn’t have the best interpretation of postmodernism. That even though they describe things in this way, they do so more as a warning than an endorsement.
I was also directed towards Baudrillard as an important figure. He talks about how technology is blurring the distinction between reality and fiction to the point where actual reality becomes unreal. It is essentially turning humans into products without any consciousness of their own.
I’m still working on delving deeper and reconciling all this.
My way of looking at it is that all that is said to you above, as you have written in the first paragraph, is still from the point of view of the ascetic ideal. For instance the insistence that you need to acquiesce to the best interpretation of postmodernism, or that you are required to heed “warnings”. All of this is replete with a particular attitude of fear, timidity and endangerment that are much more closely representative of Nietzsche’s ascetic priest and his mode of thinking than they are of the opposite attitude of creative determination that Nietzsche thought was necessitated by the “death of God”. The postmodernists just do not take the death of God seriously enough yet. They do not seem to understand it as a crisis that requires a different response from that of the ascetic ideal.
This was on a subreddit for The Last Psychiatrist so it isn’t dedicated to philosophy but appreciates sentiments inspired by such. And yeah no one can claim ownership on an entire movement, especially one without a founder.
Few people, particularly after the last half of the 20th century, can appr...
(more)I’ve lived in colonial Africa, with a very 19th Century “God” experience, so my take on postmodernism is very much an outcome of a specific sort of historical knowledge.
That knowledge and experience is fading from public awareness. It’s easy to forget that how you lived hasn’t always been so. It’s good to leave some records for posterity.
I have been deliberately leaving as much of a record as possible, withe the hope that if not this generation, future generations will at last make reasonable and comprehending sense of it. The current group of people draw the wrong conclusions even if you explain again and again to them that the past was very much unlike the present. They refuse to accept it, actually.
APES IN CAPES!
Add a comment